About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brittany Messenger '10 published on March 27, 2009 5:21 PM.

Summit offers forum for diversity discussion was the previous entry in this blog.

Live performance part of visualization lab show on Caesar is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Link With Us!


Gingrich spurs lively dialogue in jam-packed Chapel

| Comments (4)

video icon Newt Gingrich, former speaker of the House of Representatives, easily moved from lecturer to town hall host Thursday night as he initiated a rigorous dialogue with students and community members who filled every available seat and lined the aisles of Memorial Chapel.

Gingrich spoke without notes during his lecture, in which he said America is in a very dangerous place with an economic situation not seen in 80 years.

No one has a clue on how to address the crisis, he said, including members of Congress who are "culpable, not capable."

Striking a populist tone at times, Gingrich advised audience members to view the recovery efforts with caution.

"Over the next three, four or five months, read, watch, think. Don't assume that the lessons learned in the last forty years apply. We're in the early stages of fundamental change. You have to go back to first principles because you don't have a road map to help you."

Former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich speaks in a jam-packed Memorial Chapel. (Photo by Andy Daddio)

A fundamental principle that Gingrich referred to received a great deal of applause from the audience: "The conversation we should have been having for the past two years that none of our political leaders has the nerve to have is: If you can't afford to buy a house ... I think you know the other half of that statement"

Gingrich, who served 20 years in Congress and won widespread recognition for developing the Republican Party's "Contract with America" in 1994, lambasted the CEOs of Citigroup and other struggling financial institutions.

But throwing taxpayer money at failing banks is not the way to go, he said, because it doesn't create the momentum needed to enact meaningful change.

"I hope people do listen to him and work to make changes," Sarah Demaree '09 said after listening to Gingrich. She will work as an intern this summer in the Washington D.C. office of Rep. Greg Walden, a Republican from Oregon.

Gingrich took numerous questions from audience members, ranging from the economy, AIG bonuses, church-state issues, and gay marriage.

"People react to him strongly, and the question-and-answer session gave it that vitality," said Robert Kraynak, professor of political science and director of the Center for Freedom & Western Civilization, which co-sponsored the event with the College Republicans.

"Because we have begun a new era in American politics with the Obama administration, I believe we need to begin a respectful but critical discussion about whether that administration is leading us in the right direction or the wrong direction and whether America is heading for prosperity or decline," said Kraynak. "Newt Gingrich is the best person in America today to lead us in this discussion."

4 Comments

April 1, 2009 2:16 PM
Marianne Janack said:

I agree with John that all this moral outrage that Newt Gingrich and his allies are indulging in is just a little too rich. And while Rob is right that there is plenty of blame to go around, I do think that the philosophical commitments of the Republicans to deregulation make this calamity much more their responsibility than the Democrats'. Let us not forget that the Republicans controlled Congress during much of the time that these policy decisions were enacted.

So while the sins of the Democrats were mostly those of omission (not stopping these policies), for the Republicans these were sins of commission, since such deregulation was a goal they embraced, and we now see its fruits.

I do agree with Rob, however, that the attempt to subsidize home ownership through policy initiatives is a goal that needs to be critically evaluated.

And to Clifford: I don't think we need to worry about Colgate students coming out with an unrealistically liberal view of the world. I taught there recently as a visiting scholar--it is still a student body that is pretty middle of the road, perhaps leaning more toward the conservative end of the spectrum politically (but not socially--in that sense they're closer to moderate Republicans, I'd say.)

Marianne Janack '86

March 31, 2009 1:22 PM
F. Clifford Gibbons '83 said:

I don't agree with Gingrich or his party but I am glad that Colgate is getting a diversity of opinions before its studentry. I am concerned that the institution has become unrealistically liberal and PC in preparing young people for the real world.

March 31, 2009 12:24 PM
R. Lingo said:

John,
While I understand your point, I would ask you: Did ANYONE present a serious and viable method to avoid the economic crisis prior to 2008? I think you'll find the answer is a resounding no.

Mainly, because very few people understand the dual nature of the mortgage crisis. It wasn't just the packaging of high-risk loans into "low-risk" consolidated assets. The bottom fell out because the entire market was grossly overvalued, especially in certain markets.

This had been happening for a long time, as a result of several well-intentioned policies to promote home ownership. The result of which was to create the APPEARANCE that "your home is your best investment." In other words, each time the government added a layer of home-buying incentives (VA loans, mortgage interest exemptions, STAR, on and on . . .) the market for housing (which should logically mark to inflation) would sustain an artificial increase.

And financial planners everywhere told clients,"Buy as much house as you can afford."

Common-sense tells us that buying an immense excess in housing capacity will lead to market correction, when the artificial returns drop back to zero.

This was further complicated by households financing their day-to-day by borrowing against imaginary equity (the "ATM effect").

Blaming the mortgage brokers alone is easy, but insufficient. Congress did not understand the problem, and therefore could not have fixed it.

Maybe we should send them all, Pres. Obama included, back to Econ 101 & 102?

This might be what Gingrich meant by "going back to first principles"?

All the best,
Rob

March 28, 2009 7:25 PM
John G. Stewart '57 said:

Can anyone recall one comment from Gingrich the past decade about the dangers of obliterating any pretense of regulating all the new financial instruments, derivatives, credit default swaps, etc., that led us to our present disaster?

Indeed, Gingrich was leading the pack of the deregulators and those who struck down the wall of separation between commercial and investment banking. Is he lining up with Obama in his proposals to reinstitute regulation of these financial instruments and practices? Not on your life.

While at least he has more civility than Rush, Gingrich's principal hope is to see the Obama Administration "fail." Gingrich is a voice from the past that conveniently ignores his past role in bringing the country to its present crisis. Lively and provocative he surely is. Wise and accountable for his past record he surely isn't.


Leave a comment



Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Categories

,